Academe Learn
CBME Curriculum Preview

Page 16 of 16

CM16.1-5 | Health Planning and Management — PBL Case

CLINICAL SETTING

Dr. Priya Nair has just been posted as District Medical Officer (DMO) to Sonpur district, Odisha — a predominantly tribal district of 900,000 population, with 45% ST population spread across four talukas and several inaccessible forest blocks. On her first day, she receives three urgent files: (1) the District Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) is 64/1,000 live births — nearly double the state average of 36 and four times the NHP 2017 target of 16 by 2025; (2) the district has 12 functional PHCs against an IPHS norm requirement of 30 for the plains population (the hilly blocks need still more); (3) the annual programme implementation plan (PIP) submitted to the state last March was returned with a note: 'Priorities unclear; M&E indicators missing; cost estimates not justifiable — RESUBMIT.' Dr. Nair has 8 weeks to resubmit a credible district plan before the next state-level NHM review.

Trigger 1: The Infrastructure Gap

Dr. Nair calls her district data cell and learns: against 30 PHCs required by IPHS plains norms, only 12 are functional; 6 more buildings exist but lack staff. The three tribal sub-districts qualify for hilly-area norms (PHC per 20,000 population) but this has never been applied in Sonpur. The Sub-Centre count is 110 against an IPHS requirement of 180 (plains) or higher (tribal blocks). The one CHC covering 1,80,000 population has no specialist obstetrician for the past 14 months — the post has been vacant since the last incumbent resigned. Staff Nurse vacancies at PHCs are 68%. The HMIS shows institutional delivery rate of 29% in tribal blocks vs 74% in plains blocks.

DISCUSSION POINTS

  • Using IPHS norms, calculate the shortfall in Sub-Centres for the tribal sub-districts of Sonpur if hilly-area norms are applied. Show your working.
  • Which of these infrastructure/human resource gaps is MOST likely to explain the high IMR? What epidemiological evidence would you look for to confirm this?
  • What phase of the planning cycle should Dr. Nair be in right now? What specific data does she still need before she can set priorities?
Click to reveal Trigger 2: Priority-Setting Under Resource Constraints (discuss previous trigger first!)

Trigger 2: Priority-Setting Under Resource Constraints

Dr. Nair completes her situation analysis. The district epidemiological profile shows: neonatal mortality accounts for 68% of under-five deaths; major causes are birth asphyxia (32%), neonatal sepsis (28%), and hypothermia (18%). Severe acute malnutrition (SAM) prevalence is 14.3% in the 6–59 month age group. Diarrhoeal disease accounts for 22% of PHC outpatient visits but 0 deaths reported (under-reporting suspected). The state NHM programme officer has told Dr. Nair that her revised PIP can request a maximum additional allocation of ₹2.5 crore beyond the existing district envelope. Two senior PHC medical officers have proposed Option A: invest in three new Nutrition Rehabilitation Centres (NRCs) at ₹8.5 lakh per year each. The district's Community Health Officer proposes Option B: scale up community-based management of SAM (CMAM) using RUTF at ₹1,200 per child episode, estimated to treat 800 children in year 1 at ₹9.6 lakh total.

DISCUSSION POINTS

  • Apply a priority-setting framework (burden of disease, feasibility, cost-effectiveness) to rank the THREE most important health problems in Sonpur. Justify your ranking.
  • Conduct a health economics comparison of Option A (NRC) vs Option B (CMAM) for SAM management. What type of economic analysis is this? Which option should Dr. Nair recommend, and what is one limitation of her analysis?
  • If you were to write a Logframe for the neonatal mortality intervention, what would you place in each row of the 4×4 matrix (Goal, Purpose, Outputs, Activities)? What are two key assumptions you would need to state?
Click to reveal Trigger 3: National Programmes, M&E, and the Resubmission (discuss previous trigger first!)

Trigger 3: National Programmes, M&E, and the Resubmission

Dr. Nair drafts her revised PIP. She plans to leverage: (1) Ayushman Bharat's Health and Wellness Centres — Sonpur has 45 HWCs operational out of a planned 180; she wants to accelerate completion and add NCD screening; (2) PM-JAY — district data shows only 31% of eligible tribal families have a PM-JAY e-card; she proposes an enrolment drive linked to PHC visits; (3) a PDSA cycle at two PHCs to test a new birth-companion policy aimed at increasing institutional deliveries in tribal blocks. The state reviewer returns a second query: 'Your M&E section lists only output indicators (number of deliveries conducted, number of HWCs opened). We cannot track programme effectiveness without outcome indicators. Please revise and include the measurement methodology.' Dr. Nair must now redesign the M&E framework and finalise the plan.

DISCUSSION POINTS

  • Distinguish between the two pillars of Ayushman Bharat (HWCs vs PM-JAY). How should each be used in Sonpur's district plan for different target populations and health needs?
  • Revise Dr. Nair's M&E framework: provide TWO output indicators, TWO outcome indicators, and ONE impact indicator for the neonatal mortality programme. For each, specify the data source and measurement frequency.
  • Should the three tribal sub-districts of Sonpur receive a disproportionately larger share of the ₹2.5 crore additional allocation? Invoke the equity principle that justifies your answer and explain how this aligns with NHP 2017 goals.

Group Task Assignments

Group 1: Infrastructure mapping and IPHS gap analysis

  • Calculate the exact SC/PHC/CHC shortfall in Sonpur using IPHS plains and hilly norms
  • Prepare a table showing current vs required facilities by taluka
  • Identify which infrastructure gap is most actionable within 12 months

Competencies: CM16.1, CM16.4

Group 2: Epidemiological situation analysis and priority-setting

  • Map Sonpur's disease burden using the data provided (IMR, cause-specific neonatal mortality, SAM prevalence)
  • Apply a priority-setting matrix (burden × feasibility × cost-effectiveness) to rank the top 3 problems
  • Identify 2 additional data sources Dr. Nair should collect to strengthen the situation analysis

Competencies: CM16.2, CM16.5

Group 3: Health economics — SAM management options

  • Perform a cost-minimisation/CEA comparison of NRC vs CMAM for SAM
  • Calculate total year-1 cost of each option and cost per child treated
  • Recommend one option with justification including equity and sustainability considerations

Competencies: CM16.5

Group 4: Logframe construction for neonatal mortality intervention

  • Draft a 4×4 Logframe for reducing neonatal mortality in Sonpur by 20% in 12 months
  • Populate all 4 rows (Goal, Purpose, Outputs, Activities) and 3 columns (Summary, OVI, MOV)
  • Identify 3 key assumptions in the 4th column

Competencies: CM16.3

Group 5: M&E framework and Ayushman Bharat programme linkage

  • Design a 3-level M&E framework (output/outcome/impact indicators) for the neonatal mortality programme
  • Explain how HWCs and PM-JAY serve different functions in Sonpur's plan
  • Argue the equity case for differential allocation to tribal sub-districts using NHP 2017 targets

Competencies: CM16.4, CM16.5

Learning Issues

Research these questions and bring your findings to the discussion.

  1. [CM16.1] What is Park's definition of health planning, and what are the four core principles (feasibility, equity, effectiveness, efficiency) that govern a health plan? How does each principle constrain the planner's choices?
  2. [CM16.2] Describe all six phases of the health planning cycle. At which phase do district PIPs under NHM fit? What happens when planning is conducted without a rigorous situation analysis?
  3. [CM16.3] Compare and contrast the Gantt chart, PERT/CPM, and Logframe as planning and management tools. For which type of programme is each best suited? How does the PDSA cycle differ from Logframe in purpose and application?
  4. [CM16.4] Trace the evolution of India's National Health Policies (NHP 1983, NHP 2002, NHP 2017). What new commitments did NHP 2017 make on public health expenditure, OOP reduction, and UHC? How do Ayushman Bharat's two pillars operationalise these commitments?
  5. [CM16.5] Define cost-effectiveness analysis, cost-benefit analysis, cost-utility analysis, and cost-minimisation analysis. For each, state: (i) the unit of outcome measurement, (ii) a health sector example, and (iii) one limitation. What is India's current OOP expenditure as a percentage of THE, and what is the NHP 2017 target?