Page 18 of 19
IM9.1-17 | Anaemia — Assignment
CLINICAL SCENARIO
This assignment requires you to produce a structured clinical case report and management plan for a patient with anaemia, based on a case scenario provided by your faculty or drawn from your clinical posting. You will demonstrate competency in structured history-taking, systematic physical examination, interpretation of iron studies and other investigations, evidence-based management prescribing, and patient-centred communication. The case report should reflect the integrated diagnostic approach taught in the Anaemia SDLs — classification by MCV and reticulocyte count, iron studies pattern interpretation, and cause-specific treatment.
Instructions
Write a structured clinical case report using the six sections below. Base your report on an actual patient from your clinical posting or on the faculty-provided case scenario. Use precise clinical language throughout. For all investigations, state the value, the normal range, and your interpretation — do not simply list results. For management, prescribe specifically: drug, dose, route, timing, duration. Do not copy SDL text verbatim. Word limit: 1,000–1,400 words.
Length: 1,000–1,400 words across all sections
What to Submit
Section 1: Structured Clinical History
Guidance: Document the clinical history of your anaemia patient using the seven-domain framework: (1) onset and course of symptoms; (2) dietary history (vegetarian/non-vegetarian, tea/coffee intake, caloric adequacy); (3) blood loss (GI symptoms, menstrual history — duration, cycle length, clots, intermenstrual bleeding, number of pads/day); (4) obstetric and reproductive history; (5) prior anaemia diagnosis and treatment (response to previous iron, B12, or folate); (6) medications (NSAIDs, PPIs, methotrexate, anticonvulsants); (7) family and ethnic background (thalassaemia, sickle cell, G6PD in family; tribal or coastal origin). For each domain, explicitly state how the finding supports or argues against a specific anaemia aetiology. Approximately 300 words.
Section 2: Physical Examination
Guidance: Document the systematic physical examination. (a) Pallor: assess and grade at all four sites — palpebral conjunctivae, palmar creases, tongue, and nail beds. State which sites showed pallor and which did not. (b) Hyperdynamic circulation: document heart rate, bounding pulse, capillary refill, and any cardiac flow murmur. (c) Aetiology-specific signs: state whether the following are present or absent for EACH of the following signs, and for those present, state their diagnostic significance: koilonychia, glossitis, angular stomatitis, jaundice, lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly, bone tenderness, neurological findings (vibration/proprioception). Approximately 250 words.
Section 3: Investigation Interpretation and Differential Diagnosis
Guidance: Interpret the investigations provided (CBC/haemogram, MCV, RDW, reticulocyte count, peripheral smear, iron studies — ferritin, TIBC, serum iron, transferrin saturation, and any additional tests performed). For iron studies: state the values, the normal ranges you are applying, and identify which pattern is present (IDA, ACD, thalassaemia trait, or mixed). Construct a ranked differential diagnosis of at least three possibilities, stating your pre-test probability for each and the specific finding that most strongly supports or argues against it. Approximately 250 words.
Section 4: Evidence-Based Management Plan
Guidance: Write a complete management plan: (a) Cause-specific treatment: state the drug, preparation, dose, route, timing (e.g., before meals with vitamin C), and duration. For IDA: specify elemental iron content of the preparation chosen. State when to reassess and what response you expect (Hb rise per month). (b) Transfusion decision: state whether a transfusion is indicated, applying the restrictive threshold (Hb < 7 g/dL for stable, or < 8 g/dL with symptoms/cardiovascular risk). If indicated, state the component and target Hb. (c) Prevention: is the patient eligible for any national programme (AMB, WIFS, antenatal IFA supplementation)? (d) Specialist referral indication: state the trigger for haematology/gastroenterology referral. Approximately 250 words.
Section 5: Patient Communication and Counselling
Guidance: Write a concise communication plan directed at your specific patient. Include: (a) How you would explain the diagnosis in plain language appropriate to the patient's education and language background; (b) Instructions for iron tablets: when to take them, what to expect (black stools, possible GI discomfort), what to avoid (tea, coffee, antacids within 2 hours), and why the course must be completed even after feeling better; (c) Dietary advice: name at least three iron-rich foods relevant to the patient's dietary preference (vegetarian-appropriate if applicable); (d) When to return urgently. Approximately 200 words.
Section 6: Reflection
Guidance: In 100-150 words, reflect on ONE specific decision point in this case where a systematic diagnostic approach — using MCV, reticulocyte count, or iron studies — either changed your management or prevented an error. For example: how would you have managed this patient if you had simply prescribed iron empirically without investigations? What error or harm might have resulted? Approximately 150 words.
Grading Rubric — Anaemia Clinical Case Report Rubric
| Criterion | Points | Full-marks descriptor |
|---|---|---|
| Structured Clinical History (Section 1): All seven history domains documented with aetiology-directed reasoning — each finding mapped to a specific anaemia category or mechanism. | 20 pts | All seven domains (onset/course, dietary history, blood loss, menstrual/obstetric, prior anaemia/treatment, medications, family/ethnic background) are documented with explicit linking of each finding to a specific anaemia mechanism or differential diagnosis. History is integrated, not listed. |
| Physical Examination with Aetiology-Specific Findings (Section 2): Systematic general examination (pallor, signs of hyperdynamic circulation) documented with aetiology-specific signs correctly attributed. | 20 pts | Pallor assessed at all four sites with correct grading; hyperdynamic signs (tachycardia, bounding pulse, flow murmur) documented; aetiology-specific signs (koilonychia, glossitis, angular stomatitis, jaundice, splenomegaly, lymphadenopathy, bone tenderness) listed with their diagnostic significance correctly stated. |
| Iron Studies Interpretation and Differential Diagnosis (Section 3): Correctly interprets the provided iron studies pattern and constructs a ranked differential with reasoning. | 20 pts | Correctly identifies the iron studies pattern (ferritin, TIBC, transferrin saturation, serum iron) with explicit reference to normal ranges; correctly names the pattern (IDA vs ACD vs thalassaemia trait vs combined); ranked differential based on MCV, reticulocyte count, and iron studies with explicit pre-test probability reasoning. |
| Evidence-Based Management Plan (Section 4): Correct, cause-specific treatment including route, dose, duration, and monitoring; transfusion indication addressed correctly. | 20 pts | Oral ferrous sulphate: correct dose (65 mg elemental iron with vitamin C, away from tea/food), duration (3-6 months after Hb normalises, until ferritin > 30 mcg/L), and monitoring (Hb at 4-8 weeks, ferritin at 3-6 months); transfusion threshold correctly stated (Hb < 7 g/dL for stable patients or Hb < 8 g/dL with symptoms); national programme (AMB/WIFS) referenced appropriately. |
| Patient Communication and Counselling Plan (Section 5): A realistic, plain-language communication plan addressing diagnosis, treatment, adherence, and prevention tailored to the patient's context. | 15 pts | Communication plan includes: explanation of diagnosis in plain language appropriate to education level; iron tablet instructions (before meals, avoid tea, expect black stools, duration); specific advice on dietary iron sources relevant to Indian diet (green leafy vegetables, jaggery, fortified foods); addresses why full 6-month course is needed; includes referral to WIFS/AMB if applicable. |
| Clinical Reflection (Section 6): Demonstrates genuine reflection on how the structured diagnostic approach changed management compared to empirical iron treatment. | 5 pts | Specific, credible reflection identifying a concrete decision point (e.g., how iron studies prevented prescribing iron to a thalassaemia carrier, or how B12 check before iron prevented the folic acid trap) that illustrates the value of the diagnostic algorithm. |
PEER REVIEW
Review your peer's case report using the rubric provided. For each of the six sections, assign a score and write one specific comment — do not copy the rubric descriptor. Specifically check: (1) Section 3 — does the student correctly distinguish the iron studies pattern, and is the Mentzer index (MCV/RBC) used if thalassaemia trait is in the differential? (2) Section 4 — is the transfusion threshold correct (restrictive strategy, not liberal)? Is the iron dose stated with elemental iron content? Is treatment duration continued after Hb normalisation? (3) Section 5 — is the dietary advice India-appropriate and vegetarian-friendly? Submit your peer review within 72 hours.