Academe Learn
CBME Curriculum Preview

Page 29 of 29

OG35.{1-14,19},OG36.1-2,OG38.4 | Core Clinical Skills — PBL Case

CLINICAL SETTING

It is 11:30 PM at a 30-bed Community Health Centre (CHC) in a rural district. Dr. Priya Menon, a final-year intern on overnight call, receives a phone alert: an ambulance is 10 minutes away carrying a 24-year-old woman referred from a Primary Health Centre 45 km away with 'heavy bleeding in pregnancy.' The CHC has one operating theatre (locked, with no obstetrician on site tonight), a blood bank that can provide O-negative blood only in emergencies, an oxytocin vial in the emergency tray, and a functional anaesthetic machine. The duty nurse calls to say the patient has arrived and looks 'very pale and anxious.' Dr. Menon is the only doctor in the building.

Trigger 1: First contact — the referral note

The ambulance attendant hands Dr. Menon a handwritten referral note from the PHC: 'Mrs. Sunita, 24 years, G1P0, 34 weeks gestation. Presenting complaint: vaginal bleeding since 8 PM (approximately 3.5 hours). BP at PHC: 86/54. Pulse: 126/min. Treatment given: IV line inserted, 500 mL normal saline running. No MgSO4 given. Fundal height 32 weeks. No previous ANC records available. Referred urgently.' On examination by Dr. Menon: the patient is conscious but confused, pale conjunctivae, cold clammy skin, pulse 130/min thready, BP 82/58 mmHg. The patient whispers that she had a 'fall from a stool' at home three hours ago before the bleeding started.

DISCUSSION POINTS

  • What does the shock index tell you at this point, and what class of haemorrhagic shock does it correspond to?
  • What are the two most likely diagnoses for antepartum haemorrhage at 34 weeks, and how does the history of trauma help you differentiate?
  • What critical information is missing from the referral note that would have changed your initial management?
  • What is the immediate ABCDE priority at this moment, before any diagnosis is made?
Click to reveal Trigger 2: Clinical assessment and resuscitation (discuss previous trigger first!)

Trigger 2: Clinical assessment and resuscitation

Dr. Menon calls the nurse and establishes two large-bore IV lines (16G). She sends blood for haemoglobin, blood group, cross-match, and coagulation. She calls for O-negative blood from the blood bank. On rapid abdominal examination: uterus is tense and tender, board-like on palpation, SFH is 34 cm, fetal heart sounds are heard at 116 bpm (borderline). The patient has had NO previous antenatal care and says she does not know her blood group. There is no visible placenta on initial examination. The patient's mother-in-law, who accompanied her, says the family does not consent to blood transfusion 'on religious grounds.' Sunita looks at Dr. Menon, then looks away.

DISCUSSION POINTS

  • What is the most likely diagnosis now, and what is the distinguishing clinical feature that confirms it?
  • How would you approach the situation where the family refuses blood transfusion on religious grounds, but the patient herself has not explicitly refused? What ethical principle governs this?
  • What is the appropriate fluid resuscitation strategy at a CHC without a blood bank capable of cross-matched blood? What are the risks?
  • What monitoring parameters tell you whether the patient is responding to initial resuscitation?
Click to reveal Trigger 3: Communication under pressure (discuss previous trigger first!)

Trigger 3: Communication under pressure

The haemoglobin result returns: 5.8 g/dL. The coagulation screen shows a prolonged clotting time (INR 2.1). The on-call obstetrician from the District Hospital, reached by phone, says: 'This sounds like an abruption with DIC — she needs to be in theatre. Transfer her NOW.' Dr. Menon must explain the diagnosis, the need for blood transfusion, and the need for immediate transfer to Sunita directly, as her mother-in-law is standing at the doorway repeating that they do not want blood. Sunita is frightened and not sure who to listen to.

DISCUSSION POINTS

  • How would you explain the diagnosis of placental abruption and the risk of DIC to Sunita using plain, non-technical language?
  • What is the ethical and legal framework that governs a conscious adult patient's right to make her own decision about blood transfusion, distinct from a family member's stated refusal?
  • What MUST the referral note to the District Hospital contain in this case? What would a deficient referral note look like, and what harm could it cause?
  • What is the minimum stabilisation that should be done before transfer, and at what point does further delay at the CHC become unsafe?
Click to reveal Trigger 4: The referral and handover (discuss previous trigger first!)

Trigger 4: The referral and handover

After a direct conversation with Sunita alone (mother-in-law asked to wait outside), Sunita says quietly: 'Doctor, if it is to save my baby, please give whatever is needed. I am scared.' Dr. Menon documents this clearly in the notes and proceeds with transfusion of O-negative blood while preparing the transfer. She calls the District Hospital and gives a verbal handover to the receiving obstetrician. She then writes the referral note. The ambulance is ready. The duty nurse asks Dr. Menon: 'Before she goes, do you need to do a per-vaginal examination to check the cervix?'

DISCUSSION POINTS

  • How should Dr. Menon document Sunita's consent in the medical record, given that the family objected but the patient consented?
  • What are the components of an effective verbal handover (SBAR or equivalent), and why does a verbal handover complement but not replace a written referral note?
  • Should Dr. Menon perform a per-vaginal examination before transfer? What is the specific contraindication and why?
  • What are the elements of the written referral note that are non-negotiable in this case to ensure safe, continuous care at the receiving hospital?
Click to reveal Trigger 5: Debrief and systems reflection (discuss previous trigger first!)

Trigger 5: Debrief and systems reflection

Sunita is transferred safely. Two days later, Dr. Menon learns that Sunita had an emergency caesarean section for placental abruption with a live baby delivered at 34 weeks (birth weight 1.8 kg) and is recovering well. She also hears that the PHC from which Sunita was referred had MgSO4 in stock but it was not used because 'the doctor was not sure if it was needed.' The PHC's triage register shows that Sunita had waited 45 minutes in the general queue before she was seen.

DISCUSSION POINTS

  • What systems-level failure at the PHC contributed to the delayed recognition and inadequate pre-transfer management?
  • What organisational changes to the PHC's ANC clinic and emergency triage system would have reduced the risk of this outcome?
  • What is the Confidential Enquiry into Maternal Deaths (CEMD) approach to analysing a case like this, and what 'avoidable factors' framework would it apply?
  • How would you, as a future clinician, apply the lessons from this case to your own future practice in clinic organisation (OG36.2) and need-based treatment planning (OG36.1)?

Group Task Assignments

  • Construct a differential diagnosis for antepartum haemorrhage at 34 weeks, listing the distinguishing clinical features that differentiate placenta praevia from placental abruption.
  • Draft a complete, legally defensible referral note from the CHC to the District Hospital for this case, including all components required under the competency OG35.13.
  • Role-play the conversation between Dr. Menon and Sunita (Trigger 3) — one student plays the doctor, one plays Sunita. Apply the SPIKES protocol and document how patient autonomy was respected.
  • Design a three-tier triage protocol for the PHC that would have identified Sunita as a priority patient when she arrived — specify the criteria for each tier and the maximum wait time.
  • List the five most critical components of a verbal handover for this obstetric emergency and explain why each is essential for the receiving team.

Learning Issues

Research these questions and bring your findings to the discussion.

  1. [OG35.19] What is the clinical definition of antepartum haemorrhage, and what are the key clinical features that differentiate placental abruption from placenta praevia?
  2. [OG35.3] At what point does a patient at a primary or secondary facility require urgent referral, and what are the minimum stabilisation steps that MUST be completed before transfer?
  3. [OG35.13] What are the essential components of a referral note for an obstetric emergency, and what specific information prevents dangerous gaps in care at the receiving facility?
  4. [OG35.10] When a family member refuses a procedure or treatment on a conscious adult patient's behalf, what is the ethical and legal framework that governs the patient's own right to consent?
  5. [OG35.7] How does the SPIKES protocol apply to breaking an emergency diagnosis in an acute obstetric setting, and what modifications are required when time is critically limited?
  6. [OG36.2] What is a three-tier colour-coded triage system, how is it implemented at a PHC or CHC, and what are the maximum waiting times for each tier?
  7. [OG36.1] What is the need-based, cost-effective principle of treatment planning, and how is it applied when a resource (matched blood) is unavailable but an alternative (O-negative blood) exists?