Page 19 of 20
PE21.1-5 | Rheumatology — Assignment
CLINICAL SCENARIO
You are presented with a clinical vignette of a child referred to the paediatric outpatient department with a suspected rheumatological disorder. Your task is to apply your knowledge of paediatric rheumatology — including HSP/IgA vasculitis, Kawasaki Disease, JIA, and SLE — to recognise the condition, justify your diagnostic approach, and outline an evidence-based management plan. This assignment develops the clinical reasoning skills required for competent recognition and referral of children with rheumatological disease, a core NMC 2024 competency.
Instructions
- Read the vignette carefully. 2. Identify the most likely rheumatological diagnosis with justification using appropriate classification criteria (EULAR/PRINTO/PRES for HSP; American Heart Association for Kawasaki; ILAR for JIA; SLICC/EULAR-ACR for SLE). 3. List and prioritise the investigations you would order, explaining what each test is expected to show and why it is needed. 4. Outline a management plan including pharmacological and non-pharmacological components, follow-up schedule, and monitoring parameters specific to the disease and its complications. 5. Discuss one serious complication of this condition — its early recognition, prevention where applicable, and its impact on long-term prognosis. 6. Include a brief note on parental counselling: what would you tell the parents about the diagnosis, treatment goals, and follow-up?
Length: 1,000–1,400 words (excluding vignette re-statement). Each section should be clearly headed.
What to Submit
Section 1: Diagnosis and Classification
Guidance: State the most likely diagnosis. Apply the relevant classification criteria (ILAR for JIA — specify the exact subtype with justification based on joint count, systemic features, serology, and duration). Discuss two differential diagnoses and explain why each is less likely in this case.
Section 2: Investigation Plan
Guidance: List the investigations you would request: (a) those already done and their interpretation; (b) additional investigations — include imaging (X-ray of affected joints; consider MRI), complete eye evaluation, and any additional autoantibodies. Explain what each is expected to reveal and how it changes management.
Section 3: Management Plan
Guidance: Outline treatment in three components: (i) pharmacological — NSAIDs for symptom control; DMARD therapy (which first-line DMARD, dose in mg/m²/week, route, co-prescriptions such as folic acid, and monitoring protocol); (ii) ophthalmological — explain the uveitis screening interval and treatment approach; (iii) physical therapy/rehabilitation — role of physiotherapy and occupational therapy.
Section 4: Complication Discussion
Guidance: Focus on the silent uveitis detected. Discuss: the pathophysiology of JIA-associated anterior uveitis; why it is asymptomatic; what structural complications arise if untreated (band keratopathy, posterior synechiae, cataract, glaucoma); the recommended screening frequency per ACR/AAP risk stratification; and the escalation pathway from topical steroids to systemic immunosuppression/biologics for refractory uveitis.
Section 5: Parental Counselling and Long-term Prognosis
Guidance: Write a brief structured note (as if explaining to a parent) covering: what JIA is (chronic autoimmune arthritis — not adult RA); treatment goals (remission, not just pain control); the importance of regular eye checks even without symptoms; the impact of JIA on schooling and activities; and when to seek urgent review (loss of vision, flare of joints, drug side effects).
Grading Rubric — Paediatric Rheumatology Case Write-up Rubric
| Criterion | Points | Full-marks descriptor |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic accuracy and application of classification criteria | 20 pts | Correct JIA subtype identified (oligoarticular, ≤4 joints, extended oligoarticular risk noted), ILAR classification applied precisely, two well-reasoned differentials with clear exclusion rationale. |
| Investigation plan: relevance, prioritisation, and interpretation | 15 pts | Comprehensive investigation plan: interprets existing results correctly (ANA+ RF-/CCP- oligoarticular JIA profile); adds joint X-rays, MRI for early erosion assessment, eye examination findings, ANA subsets if indicated; each test result explained. |
| Management plan: pharmacological, ophthalmological, and rehabilitative components | 25 pts | Methotrexate cited as first-line DMARD at correct dose (10–15 mg/m²/week); folic acid co-prescription included; uveitis management (topical steroids + mydriatics → methotrexate/anti-TNF pathway) described correctly; physiotherapy role articulated; monitoring protocol for MTX (LFTs, CBC) stated. |
| Depth of uveitis complication discussion | 20 pts | Clearly explains asymptomatic 'white eye' nature; lists structural complications (band keratopathy, synechiae, cataract, glaucoma); states ACR/AAP screening frequency (every 3 months for high-risk); describes escalation to methotrexate/anti-TNF for steroid-refractory uveitis; long-term vision prognosis addressed. |
| Parental counselling: clarity, accuracy, and empathy | 20 pts | Clear, jargon-free explanation of JIA as a chronic but treatable condition; distinguishes paediatric JIA from adult RA; explains why eye checks are needed even without symptoms; describes treatment goals (remission, preserve vision and function); gives concrete red-flag symptoms; empathetic and age-appropriate tone. |
PEER REVIEW
Your peer has submitted a clinical case analysis for a child with paediatric rheumatological disease. Review their write-up using the following framework: (1) Diagnostic accuracy — did they apply the correct ILAR classification? Is the subtype precisely identified? (2) Investigation plan — are the investigations relevant and correctly interpreted? (3) Management — is methotrexate cited correctly with folic acid co-prescription? Is the uveitis management pathway correct? (4) Complication discussion — is the silent uveitis section thorough and evidence-based? (5) Counselling — is the parent note clear, empathetic, and free of unnecessary jargon? Provide at least TWO specific strengths and TWO constructive suggestions for improvement. Be respectful and constructive.