Page 20 of 21

PE7.1-8,PE8.1-5 | Infant Feeding — Assignment

CLINICAL SCENARIO

You will conduct a structured feeding history on a real or simulated infant/toddler patient (6–18 months), identify gaps in feeding practices against IYCF guidelines, and write a structured clinical counselling note that your peers and faculty can assess. This assignment develops the core clinical skill of translating IYCF knowledge into actionable, culturally sensitive counselling — a routine and high-impact paediatric outpatient task.

Instructions

Select a caregiver-child pair (real patient from your ward/OPD/community posting, or a simulated case provided by your tutor) where the child is between 6 and 18 months of age.
Conduct and document a structured infant and young child feeding history using the headings in the scaffolding below.
Compare the observed feeding practices against WHO/IAP IYCF recommendations and identify at least two gaps or incorrect practices.
Write a structured IYCF counselling note as you would give verbally in an OPD setting — identify the problem, provide the evidence-based recommendation, anticipate cultural resistance, and suggest a practical local alternative.
Apply the BFHI Ten Steps where relevant (if the child is under 6 months or still breastfeeding).
Conclude with your reflection on barriers to optimal IYCF in this family's context.

Length: 1000–1500 words (excluding the gap-analysis table and the IYCF recommendation references). Quality over length — a focused, specific, evidence-linked write-up is preferred over a long generic one.

What to Submit

Section 1: Child and Family Profile

Guidance: Age of child (months), sex, birth weight, current weight and WAZ/HAZ if available. Mother's age, parity, occupation, educational level, socioeconomic status (Kuppuswamy scale). Family structure (joint/nuclear). State if this is a real patient (de-identified) or simulated case.

Section 2: Infant Feeding History

Guidance: Initiation of breastfeeding (within 1 hour? skin-to-skin?). Was colostrum given or discarded? Prelacteal feeds given (type, duration)? Current breastfeeding status (exclusive / partial / weaned). If weaned — at what age and why? Complementary feeding: age of initiation (months), first food given, current diet diary (what was given yesterday — list all meals and snacks with approximate quantities and consistency), frequency of meals per day, whether iron-rich foods (eggs, dal, green leafy vegetables, meat/fish) are included, food consistency (watery / semi-solid / mashed / family food). Is cow's milk the main drink? Has honey been given? Any cultural taboos or restricted foods.

Section 3: IYCF Gap Analysis

Guidance: Compare each feeding practice to the relevant IYCF recommendation. Present as a two-column table: 'Observed Practice' vs 'IYCF Recommendation.' Identify at least two gaps. For each gap, state the specific IYCF standard violated (e.g., exclusive breastfeeding for 6 months, no prelacteal feeds per BFHI Step 6, complementary feeding from 6 months, no cow's milk as main drink before 12 months, no honey before 12 months).

Section 4: Structured Counselling Note

Guidance: For each gap identified, write your counselling using the GATHER/SBAR format or a structured 'Identify → Explain → Recommend → Check Understanding' framework. Be specific: do not say 'feed more often' — say 'your child needs 3 meals a day of thick dal-rice with a teaspoon of ghee, plus 1–2 nutritious snacks.' Address likely cultural barriers (e.g., 'I understand your mother-in-law recommends honey water; here is why that is unsafe'). Propose practical, locally available alternatives.

Section 5: Application of BFHI or IYCF Programme Principles

Guidance: If the child is ≤6 months or still breastfeeding, reference the specific BFHI Ten Steps relevant to this case. If the child is 6–24 months and already on complementary foods, reference the IYCF principles applicable. State whether your institution is BFHI-certified and how that influenced the mother's practices.

Section 6: Reflection — Barriers to Optimal IYCF

Guidance: Identify 2–3 specific barriers in this family (economic, cultural, knowledge, health-system) that impede optimal infant feeding. Suggest one community-level or health-system-level intervention for each barrier. Reflect on one thing you would counsel differently next time.

Grading Rubric — IYCF Assessment and Counselling Rubric

Criterion	Points	Full-marks descriptor
Completeness and accuracy of feeding history (Section 2): all key IYCF domains covered (breastfeeding initiation, exclusivity, complementary feeding age, frequency, food variety, iron-rich foods, food consistency, cow's milk/honey use)	20 pts	All key feeding domains systematically documented with specific details (diet diary, quantities, consistency); no domain omitted; infant feeding language precise.
Quality of IYCF gap analysis (Section 3): accuracy of identified gaps, correct application of IYCF standards, clear comparison table	20 pts	Two or more gaps correctly identified; comparison table accurately cites specific IYCF/BFHI standards with supporting rationale; no incorrect recommendations applied.
Specificity and practicality of counselling (Section 4): evidence-based, culturally sensitive, actionable recommendations	25 pts	Counselling specific, practical, and culturally sensitive; addresses each gap with a named locally available food or behaviour change; anticipates and responds to likely cultural barriers; check-understanding step included.
Integration of BFHI Ten Steps or IYCF programme principles (Section 5): correctly identifies and applies relevant steps/principles to the case	15 pts	Relevant BFHI steps (for breastfeeding cases) or IYCF principles (for complementary feeding cases) correctly identified and mapped to the specific practices in this case.
Depth of reflection and identification of barriers (Section 6): specific barriers identified, feasible interventions proposed, personal learning noted	20 pts	2–3 specific, contextualised barriers identified (not generic); a feasible intervention mapped to each; genuine personal reflection on counselling practice with a specific improvement identified.

PEER REVIEW

Read your peer's write-up and score each rubric criterion using the descriptions above. For each criterion, write 1–2 sentences explaining why you gave that score — cite a specific example from their text. At the end, write one 'strength' (something they did well) and one 'growth area' (a specific improvement that would increase the impact of their counselling). Be constructive and specific — generic comments ('good job,' 'needs improvement') are not acceptable.