Academe Learn
CBME Curriculum Preview

Page 8 of 8

AS1.1-4 | Anaesthesiology as a Specialty — PBL Case

CLINICAL SETTING

Meenakshi, a 28-year-old primigravida at 39 weeks of gestation, is admitted to the labour ward at a tertiary care hospital in active labour (cervix 5 cm dilated, regular uterine contractions every 3 minutes). She is otherwise healthy (no diabetes, hypertension, or known drug allergies; weight 62 kg). On admission, her birth plan — written with her partner — states: 'We want a natural, drug-free birth. No epidural. No injections during labour.' The midwife notes this and flags the obstetric anaesthesia team. Dr Priya, the anaesthesiology registrar on call, introduces herself and offers to explain available analgesia options in case Meenakshi changes her mind. Meenakshi is polite but firm: 'I know what I want. I've done my research. Please respect my wishes.' Dr Priya acknowledges the preference, documents the conversation, and returns to the duty room. Two hours later, Meenakshi's contractions are now every 90 seconds and she is in severe distress (visual analogue scale pain score 9/10). Her partner calls out: 'She's screaming. Can't you do something? Give her anything — she's changed her mind!'

Trigger 1: Consent, Autonomy, and the Changing Patient

Dr Priya returns immediately. Meenakshi is distressed and between contractions says: 'I want something — but not a needle in my back.' She seems confused about which options are available. Her blood pressure is 110/70 mmHg; fetal heart rate is reassuring. Dr Priya must decide how to proceed. She considers: (a) intravenous opioid (pethidine 1 mg/kg or fentanyl), (b) Entonox (inhaled nitrous oxide 50% + O2 50%), (c) epidural, (d) no additional intervention until Meenakshi can clearly re-state her preference. The ward consultant, Dr Ramesh, arrives and says: 'She refused earlier — just leave her. We can't force anything. Document refusal and move on.'

DISCUSSION POINTS

  • Meenakshi initially refused analgesia but now appears to be changing her mind. What ethical principles are in tension here, and how should Dr Priya navigate a re-consent conversation when the patient is in severe pain?
  • Dr Ramesh says 'she refused, document it and move on.' Is this advice ethically and professionally correct? What is the anaesthesiologist's obligation when a patient may want to revoke a previous refusal?
Click to reveal Trigger 2: Clinical Decision-Making and Multi-Domain Anaesthesiology (discuss previous trigger first!)

Trigger 2: Clinical Decision-Making and Multi-Domain Anaesthesiology

After a calm interval between contractions, Dr Priya re-assesses Meenakshi. Meenakshi clearly states: 'I don't want the epidural needle — I'm scared of being paralysed. But I want something for the pain NOW.' Dr Priya explains that paralysis from epidural is extremely rare (<1:10,000) and describes the alternatives: Entonox (inhaled, self-administered, short duration, no needle), pethidine IV (moderate efficacy, sedation, crosses placenta), or epidural (most effective, titratable, can be converted to surgical block if caesarean needed). Meenakshi asks: 'Who does the epidural? Is the anaesthesiologist actually a doctor or just a technician?' Meenakshi's cervix is now 8 cm. The obstetric team informs Dr Priya that the fetal presentation has been re-confirmed as occiput posterior — likely prolonged labour; caesarean section may be needed.

DISCUSSION POINTS

  • Map the anaesthesiologist's roles relevant to Meenakshi's evolving case: which AS1.2 domains (labour analgesia, peri-operative physician, resuscitation) are now potentially involved, and in what sequence?
  • Meenakshi asks if the anaesthesiologist is 'just a technician.' How would you explain — accurately and without condescension — the anaesthesiologist's role, training, and responsibilities in her current situation?
Click to reveal Trigger 3: Escalation, Accountability, and Professionalism (discuss previous trigger first!)

Trigger 3: Escalation, Accountability, and Professionalism

Meenakshi consents to an epidural after a careful explanation. Dr Priya places it successfully. Three hours later, Meenakshi undergoes an emergency lower-segment caesarean section (LSCS) for failure to progress; the epidural catheter is used for surgical anaesthesia. The surgery is uneventful and a healthy baby is delivered. Post-operatively, Meenakshi asks to speak to the anaesthesiologist: 'I want to understand what happened. Was my epidural safe? And I'm thinking about my sister — she's terrified of needles. Is there a career where someone can do this work for patients like her?' Separately, Dr Priya reflects on the case: the consultant's initial advice to 'document refusal and move on' troubled her. She wonders whether this should be raised at the departmental morbidity and mortality (M&M) meeting.

DISCUSSION POINTS

  • How should Dr Priya respond to Meenakshi's questions about epidural safety and the anaesthesiologist's career — balancing truthfulness (veracity), reassurance, and factual accuracy?
  • Dr Priya considers raising the consultant's 'document and move on' advice at M&M. What ethical obligation does she have, and what does the principle of accountability mean for anaesthesiologists at different seniority levels?

Group Task Assignments

Group 1: Collaborative Task

  • Construct a one-page 'Anaesthesiologist Role Map' for this case: list each of the AS1.2 domains (peri-operative physician, ICU/HDU, acute pain, chronic pain, labour analgesia, resuscitation) and for each domain — mark whether it was active, potentially active, or not relevant in Meenakshi's case. Add a two-sentence justification for each decision.

Group 2: Collaborative Task

  • Draft a 200-word 'Anaesthesia Information Sheet' for obstetric patients that: (a) explains who the anaesthesiologist is and their role in the labour ward, (b) describes three available analgesia options with their key advantage and one limitation each, and (c) addresses the most common patient fear ('Will I be paralysed?') — using factual, non-alarmist language.

Learning Issues

Research these questions and bring your findings to the discussion.

  1. [AS1.2] What are the five or more distinct clinical roles of the anaesthesiologist listed under NMC competency AS1.2, and what specific skills or activities define each role?
  2. [AS1.3] When a patient who previously refused treatment appears to change their mind during a period of acute pain or distress, what ethical framework governs re-consent — specifically regarding capacity, coercion, and voluntary decision-making?
  3. [AS1.3] What is the anaesthesiologist's individual accountability when a more senior colleague gives advice that appears ethically questionable? How does the principle of veracity apply to clinical documentation in this context?
  4. [AS1.4] What are the postgraduate training pathways for anaesthesiology in India (MD/DA, fellowship, DM), and which subspecialties specifically address the care of obstetric patients?