Page 11 of 29

OG35.{7,9-10,14} | Communication, Ethics, Consent and Universal Precautions — SDL Guide (Part 3)

Interpreting and Responding to Communication and Consent Challenges

Clinical practice in obstetrics and gynaecology regularly presents communication and consent situations that are complex, emotionally charged, and time-pressured. The ability to read these situations accurately and respond appropriately is the mark of a professionally skilled clinician.

Managing treatment refusal: when a competent patient refuses a recommended procedure — a caesarean section despite fetal distress, a blood transfusion in a Jehovah's Witness, a recommended hysterectomy — the clinician's obligation is not to override the refusal but to ensure it is truly informed and documented. Use a stepwise approach: re-explain the risks of refusal in clear terms; explore the reasons for refusal (they may be based on a misunderstanding that can be corrected); involve another senior clinician if there is doubt about capacity; if refusal persists, document fully and offer continued supportive care. Never abandon a patient because she has refused a specific intervention.

Managing the angry or distressed family: in OG, families — particularly husbands and in-laws — are often present and may be highly anxious or adversarial. The response to an angry family member should be: (a) acknowledge the emotion explicitly ('I can hear how worried you are'); (b) move to a private space; (c) provide a clear, factual update; (d) invite questions; (e) avoid defensive language or blame. An angry family member who is heard and treated with respect rarely escalates to a formal complaint.

Identifying when consent is invalid: be alert to consent obtained by another team member that does not meet the validity criteria — common situations include: consent obtained in the labour room during active contractions (capacity to understand is significantly compromised); consent obtained by a student or unregistered person; consent for a procedure that has materially changed (e.g. consent for vaginal delivery when LSCS becomes necessary — a new consent or at minimum a verbal consent with documentation is required).

Reading non-verbal cues: much of what a patient communicates in an OG encounter is non-verbal — averted gaze, a tense posture, tears held back. A patient who answers every question with 'yes doctor' may be masking significant distress, confusion, or a cultural prohibition on disagreeing with a figure of authority. Slow down; use open-ended questions ('How are you feeling about all of this?'); invite the patient to ask questions in her own language if a translator is available.

CLINICAL PEARL

Three professional-skill principles that protect both patient and clinician in every OG encounter: (1) Consent is a process, not a paper — a signed form without a comprehension check is legally vulnerable. (2) In every sharps injury, the clock starts at the moment of injury — document the exact time, start PEP assessment within 1 hour, and start the drug within 2 hours where indicated. (3) Confidentiality is not suspended by family anxiety — establish the patient's disclosure preferences in private before family enters the consultation room.

Applied and Supervised Practice

The four professional skills in this module are built through deliberate practice in supervised clinical environments — not through observation alone. The NMC OG competencies OG35.7, OG35.9, OG35.10, and OG35.14 are assessed at the 'should help' (SH) and DOAP (demonstration, observation, assistance, performance) levels, meaning you are expected to perform these skills under supervision during your clinical posting.

For communication practice, use the SPIKES framework during any difficult-news encounter in your posting. Before approaching the patient, identify with your resident: What is the news? Who should be in the room? What is the patient's likely baseline understanding? After the encounter, debrief with your resident: What worked? Where did you rush? Did you check comprehension? The bereavement counselling session in the postnatal ward (after stillbirth or neonatal death) is one of the highest-value communication learning opportunities available in OG.

For ethics practice, identify an ethically complex case during your posting (a patient refusing recommended treatment, a confidentiality conflict, a consent question involving a minor) and discuss it using the four-principle framework with your resident or faculty. Present it formally at a case discussion session if your unit runs ethics rounds.

For consent practice, observe a minimum of three consent consultations — for LSCS, vaginal hysterectomy, and one emergency procedure — and use the five-step framework to self-assess each one. Then, under faculty supervision, conduct the consent consultation yourself for a straightforward elective procedure (e.g. IUCD insertion, colposcopy), with the faculty present and the patient's agreement to a learner conducting the consultation.

For universal precautions practice, complete the needle-stick injury drill available in your clinical skills laboratory: perform the correct immediate wound management, complete the incident report form correctly, and walk through the PEP decision algorithm for a simulated HIV-positive source patient. In the labour room, practise the full PPE donning-and-doffing sequence at least twice under faculty observation before your first unsupervised delivery.

Self-Assessment

The four self-assessment questions below are designed to test integration across the professional skills domains covered in this module — communication using the SPIKES framework, ethical reasoning with the four-principle model, valid informed consent in special OG situations, and universal precautions including PEP management. Each scenario is drawn from situations that arise routinely in the OG ward, labour room, and operation theatre. Work through each question independently and formulate a structured response before discussing it with a resident or faculty member during your clinical posting. These scenarios are intentionally complex — they rarely have a single correct answer, and the reasoning process matters as much as the conclusion. Reflection on these scenarios should be recorded in your AETCOM portfolio as evidence of professional development. The domains tested here — confidentiality, emergency consent, sharps injury management, and consent under time pressure — are high-yield areas in OSCE and viva examinations at the final MBBS level.

  1. A 19-year-old woman at 14 weeks gestation presents for a routine antenatal visit. Her husband accompanies her and insists on being present for the entire consultation. During a moment when the husband steps out, she tells you she has concerns about the pregnancy that she does not want her husband to know about. How do you structure the remainder of the consultation, and what documentation do you make?
  1. You are about to perform a per-vaginal examination on a patient who arrived unconscious from a road traffic accident. There are no relatives available. Using the five-step consent framework, describe what you can and cannot do, and what you must document.
  1. While assisting at a laparoscopic procedure, you receive a splash of blood to your unprotected eye. Walk through the correct immediate management and the criteria for initiating HIV PEP.
  1. A multipara at term in active labour with fetal bradycardia is being counselled for emergency LSCS. She is in pain, frightened, and her husband is insisting she sign quickly. As the clinician obtaining consent, what steps do you take to ensure the consent is legally valid despite the time pressure?

Interactive practice: Multiple Choice

Interactive practice: True / False