Page 2 of 22

PA8.1-2 | Immunity & Hypersensitivity Reactions — SDL Guide (Part 2)

Type I Hypersensitivity — Immediate/Anaphylactic

Type I is mediated by IgE bound to mast cells (in tissue) and basophils (in blood). It proceeds in two phases:

Phase 1 — Sensitization (silent):
1. First antigen exposure → antigen presentation to Th2 cells
2. Th2 cells release IL-4/IL-13 → B cells undergo IgE class-switching
3. Antigen-specific IgE is secreted and binds the high-affinity Fcε receptor (FcεRI) on mast cells and basophils
4. The individual is now sensitized — no symptoms yet

Phase 2 — Effector (symptomatic):
1. Re-exposure to same antigen → antigen cross-links two adjacent IgE molecules on mast cell surface
2. FcεRI aggregation → mast cell activation → immediate degranulation

Early phase (minutes): Pre-formed mediators released:
Histamine — vasodilation, increased vascular permeability, bronchospasm, pruritus
Heparin, proteases (tryptase, chymase)
Platelet-activating factor (PAF)
Eosinophil and neutrophil chemotactic factors

Late phase (4–8 hours): Newly synthesised mediators:
Leukotrienes (LTC4, LTD4, LTE4 = slow-reacting substances of anaphylaxis, SRS-A) — potent bronchospasm
Prostaglandins (PGD2) — vasodilation, bronchospasm
Cytokines (IL-4, IL-5, TNF) — sustain eosinophil influx, perpetuate late-phase

Three-panel diagram showing IgE-mediated sensitization, antigen re-exposure with mast cell degranulation, and early and late mediator effects in Type I hypersensitivity.

Type I Hypersensitivity: Sensitization and Effector Phases

Panel A: Sensitization phase showing antigen, antigen-presenting cell, Th2 cell, IL-4/IL-13, B cell/plasma cell, antigen-specific IgE, FcεRI, mast cell, and basophil; no symptoms yet.. Panel B: Effector phase showing re-exposure to same antigen, cross-linking of adjacent IgE molecules, FcεRI aggregation, mast cell activation, and immediate degranulation.. Panel C: Mediator effects showing early phase mediators including histamine, heparin, tryptase/chymase, PAF, eosinophil and neutrophil chemotactic factors; late phase mediators including LTC4/LTD4/LTE4, PGD2, IL-4, IL-5, and TNF with eosinophil influx..

Clinical spectrum:
Anaphylaxis — systemic; histamine-mediated hypotension + bronchospasm; life-threatening
Atopy — familial predisposition to localised Type I reactions (IgE-prone immune bias)
Bronchial asthma (extrinsic/allergic) — inhaled allergens; bronchospasm via leukotrienes
Allergic rhinitis — nasal mucosa; sneezing, rhinorrhoea
Urticaria/Angioedema — skin/subcutaneous; wheal-and-flare
Food allergy — peanut, shellfish (IgE-mediated; can trigger systemic anaphylaxis)

CLINICAL PEARL

Tryptase as a diagnostic marker of anaphylaxis: Mast cell tryptase is released exclusively during degranulation — it is not present in basophils. A serum tryptase drawn within 1–3 hours of a suspected anaphylactic event and elevated > 11.4 ng/mL strongly supports mast cell activation. Histamine itself clears from serum in < 30 minutes, making it impractical for confirmation. Always send tryptase when anaphylaxis is in the differential, especially for intraoperative reactions where the trigger may be unclear.

Allergy testing rationale: Skin prick testing introduces a tiny amount of allergen into the dermis — if IgE-sensitized mast cells are present, a wheal-and-flare reaction develops within 15 minutes (the Type I effector phase in miniature). A negative skin test reliably excludes IgE-mediated allergy to that specific antigen.

SELF-CHECK

A 30-year-old atopic woman presents with worsening asthma that is poorly controlled despite inhaled corticosteroids. Her physician considers a leukotriene receptor antagonist (montelukast). Which mast cell mediator, released in the late phase of Type I hypersensitivity, is montelukast specifically targeting?

A. Histamine (H1 receptor-mediated bronchoconstriction)

B. Platelet-activating factor (PAF)

C. Leukotrienes LTC4/LTD4/LTE4 (formerly called SRS-A)

D. Tryptase-mediated smooth muscle remodelling

Reveal Answer

Answer: C. Leukotrienes LTC4/LTD4/LTE4 (formerly called SRS-A)

Montelukast blocks the CysLT1 receptor, antagonising the cysteinyl leukotrienes LTC4, LTD4, and LTE4 — the principal late-phase bronchoconstrictors synthesised de novo from arachidonic acid by mast cells and eosinophils via the 5-lipoxygenase pathway. These were historically called the "slow-reacting substances of anaphylaxis (SRS-A)" before their chemical structures were identified. Antihistamines (targeting histamine) are effective for early-phase symptoms (urticaria, rhinorrhoea) but have minimal bronchodilatory effect in chronic asthma.

Type II Hypersensitivity — Antibody-Mediated (Cytotoxic)

Diagram of Type II hypersensitivity showing antibody binding to host targets and the three mechanisms of injury: opsonization, complement or NK-cell lysis, and receptor dysfunction.

Type II Hypersensitivity: Antibody-Mediated Injury

Panel A: IgG antibody, IgM antibody, host target cell, cell surface antigen, extracellular matrix antigen, antibody-antigen binding, three mechanism arrows. Panel B: IgG-coated red blood cell, C3b deposition, Fc receptor, complement receptor, macrophage, neutrophil, phagocytosis, spleen inset, autoimmune haemolytic anaemia. Panel C: Classical complement pathway, MAC C5b-9 pore, target cell lysis, NK cell, Fc receptor on NK cell, perforin, granzymes, ADCC, transfusion reaction, haemolytic disease of the newborn. Panel D: TSH receptor, thyroid follicular cell, stimulatory IgG, Graves disease, acetylcholine receptor, neuromuscular junction, blocking IgG, reduced acetylcholine binding, Myasthenia gravis.

In Type II reactions, IgG or IgM antibodies bind to antigens displayed on cell surfaces or extracellular matrix and damage host tissues through three distinct mechanisms:

Mechanism 1 — Opsonization and phagocytosis:
• Antibody coats the target cell → Fc receptors on macrophages/neutrophils recognise the Fc tail → phagocytosis and destruction
• Complement activation (C3b deposition) amplifies opsonization
Example: Autoimmune haemolytic anaemia — IgG against red cell antigens (Rh, Kidd, Duffy) → extravascular haemolysis in spleen

Mechanism 2 — Complement- and NK-cell–mediated lysis (ADCC):
• IgG/IgM binds target → activates classical complement pathway → MAC (C5b-9) punches hole in cell membrane → lysis
• Or: NK cells recognise Fc of bound IgG → release perforin/granzymes → antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC)
Example: Transfusion reactions (incompatible blood → intravascular haemolysis); Haemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN) — maternal IgG anti-D crosses placenta

Mechanism 3 — Receptor dysfunction (without cell destruction):
• Antibody binds a receptor and either activates it (agonist) or blocks it (antagonist) → functional disease without major inflammation
Example (agonist): Graves disease — IgG against TSH receptor mimics TSH → constitutive thyroid stimulation → hyperthyroidism
Example (antagonist): Myasthenia gravis — IgG against acetylcholine receptor (AChR) at neuromuscular junction → receptor internalisation/blockade → muscle weakness

Other Type II examples:
Goodpasture syndrome — IgG against type IV collagen in glomerular basement membrane (GBM) and alveolar BM → pulmonary haemorrhage + rapidly progressive GN
Pemphigus vulgaris — IgG against desmoglein in epidermal desmosomes → acantholysis → skin blisters
Immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) — IgG against platelet GPIIb/IIIa → platelet destruction

SELF-CHECK

A 25-year-old woman is found to have anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies. Her symptoms include fatigable ptosis and proximal muscle weakness worsening in the evening. This is BEST classified as which type of hypersensitivity, and through which specific mechanism?

A. Type I — mast cell degranulation at the neuromuscular junction

B. Type II — receptor blockade/internalisation by IgG (functional without lysis)

C. Type III — immune complex deposition in synovial membranes

D. Type IV — CD8⁺ CTL destruction of motor end-plates

Reveal Answer

Answer: B. Type II — receptor blockade/internalisation by IgG (functional without lysis)

Myasthenia gravis is Type II hypersensitivity via the receptor dysfunction mechanism: IgG antibodies bind and cross-link AChR, causing receptor internalisation and complement-mediated receptor degradation, not cell lysis. No immune complexes are deposited (not Type III), and T cells are not the direct effectors (not Type IV). The fatigable pattern results from progressive depletion of functional AChR at the end-plate, worsening with repeated nerve stimulation.

Type III Hypersensitivity — Immune Complex–Mediated

Type III reactions are caused by immune complex (IC) deposition — antigen-antibody (IgG, IgM) complexes that form in circulation or in situ and deposit in vessel walls or tissue, triggering inflammation.

Pathogenesis — four steps:
1. Complex formation: Antigen excess over antibody produces small, soluble complexes that evade phagocytosis; antibody excess produces large, rapidly cleared complexes; slight antigen excess produces the pathological intermediate-sized complexes
2. Deposition: Complexes lodge in capillaries and venules — especially in kidney glomeruli, synovial vessels, skin, and choroid plexus — driven by size, charge, and haemodynamic factors
3. Complement activation: Deposited IC activate classical pathway → C3a/C5a (anaphylatoxins: vasodilation, mast cell degranulation) + C5a (potent neutrophil chemotactant)
4. Neutrophil infiltration and tissue damage: Neutrophils attempt to phagocytose IC but fail (IC are bound to basement membranes) → frustrated phagocytosis → release of lysosomal enzymes and reactive oxygen species → fibrinoid necrosis of vessel walls (vasculitis)

Hallmark histology: Granular/lumpy-bumpy deposits on immunofluorescence (IF) — distinguish from the linear IF pattern of Goodpasture (Type II)

Diagram showing Type III hypersensitivity with immune complex deposition in a glomerular capillary, complement activation, neutrophil-mediated injury, and granular immunofluorescence compared with linear Goodpasture staining.

Type III Hypersensitivity: Immune Complex–Mediated Injury

Panel A: Glomerular capillary lumen, soluble antigen-antibody complexes, IgG/IgM immune complexes, endothelial cell, glomerular basement membrane, podocyte foot processes, subendothelial granular deposits, subepithelial granular deposits, complement C3a/C5a, neutrophil, frustrated phagocytosis, lysosomal enzymes, reactive oxygen species, fibrinoid necrosis, vasculitis.. Panel B: Complex formation in slight antigen excess, deposition in capillaries and venules, classical complement activation, C3a/C5a anaphylatoxins, C5a neutrophil chemotaxis, neutrophil infiltration, tissue damage.. Panel C: Type III granular/lumpy-bumpy immunofluorescence deposits, basement membrane, Type II Goodpasture linear immunofluorescence pattern, comparison label distinguishing immune complex disease from anti-basement membrane antibody disease..

Clinical examples:

DiseaseAntigenSite of deposition
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)Nuclear antigens (dsDNA, Sm)Glomeruli, skin, joints, vessels
Post-streptococcal GNStreptococcal antigensGlomeruli (subepithelial humps)
Serum sicknessForeign protein (antiserum)Systemic — joints, skin, kidneys
Arthus reactionLocal antigen injection (e.g., vaccine)Skin/subcutaneous (localised)
Infective endocarditisBacterial antigensGlomeruli (focal GN)

Arthus vs serum sickness: Both are Type III. Arthus is a localised reaction at the site of antigen injection (raised wheals, necrosis at the injection site within 4–8 h); serum sickness is systemic (fever, arthralgia, urticarial rash, lymphadenopathy, GN, 7–10 days after antigen exposure).

CLINICAL PEARL

The complement consumption pattern distinguishes Type II from Type III renal disease: In Goodpasture syndrome (Type II), serum complement levels are normal — antibodies bind directly to the GBM without activating complement in the fluid phase. In SLE nephritis and post-streptococcal GN (Type III), serum C3 and C4 are low (complement is consumed by immune complexes in circulation and glomeruli). Checking serum C3/C4 in a new nephritis case is a rapid, cheap screen to guide further workup — low complement points to Type III (or MPGN Type I), while a normal complement level favours Type II, anti-GBM, or pauci-immune ANCA vasculitis.

SELF-CHECK

A 19-year-old woman develops fever, migratory joint pain, urticarial rash, and mild proteinuria 9 days after receiving anti-snake venom (equine serum). Serum C3 is low. Renal biopsy shows granular IgG deposits on immunofluorescence. This is BEST explained by:

A. Type I — IgE-mediated mast cell degranulation to horse serum proteins

B. Type II — IgG antibodies against glomerular basement membrane components

C. Type III — immune complex deposition; horse serum protein is the antigen

D. Type IV — T-cell–mediated delayed hypersensitivity to equine proteins

Reveal Answer

Answer: C. Type III — immune complex deposition; horse serum protein is the antigen

This is classic serum sickness — a systemic Type III reaction. The foreign horse serum proteins act as antigen; the patient's own IgG antibodies form intermediate-sized immune complexes 7–10 days post-exposure (time for primary IgG production). Complexes deposit systemically (skin, joints, glomeruli), activate complement (hence low C3), and produce neutrophilic vasculitis. Granular IF is the hallmark; linear IF would instead point to Goodpasture (Type II). Type I is excluded by the delay (9 days, not minutes) and requires prior sensitization.